Whats behind Mobile Opt-In?

Most mobile programs require a ‘double opt-in’.

Here is what it is and why it is there:

In order for someone to start to receive text messaging they must opt in for the communications. This opt in process is different between email on mobile/text messaging. This is due to the cost of text messaging and mobile plans. Remember not all text messaging plans are created equal, there are still mobile phone plans out there that charge per text message. To prevent unnecessary costs to the consumer there is a double opt in rule to ensure the subscriber is aware of what they are signing up for. This also helps prevent spam onto your phone

In order for a company to send you a text messaging or IMs (different than a mobile apps) you must agree to 2 things:

  1. enroll into the mobile program (subscribe)
  2. and validate that the mobile number that was given is in fact your mobile number.  Usually the users is required to text ‘Y’ or ‘Yes’ back to the confirmation text – this would be your second opt in.

Mobile communication subscriptions work a little different than email subscriptions. Due to the cost structure when you enroll into a mobile program, you are only enrolling into a single program. Unlike email, when you subscribe to receive emails from retailer – your email is enrolled into all the retailers email programs. *Mobile requires the user to opt into every program individually.

Ideally this mechanism should be sufficient to establish the subscriber’s willingness to participate in the program and possession of the handset/device. The opt-in applies to the specific program and should not be used as a blanket approval to promote other programs, products or services.

When you opt out of the mobile program, the return messaging should reference the specific program the subscriber has opted-out from. No further messages should be sent to the subscriber from this program, including marketing messages for any related or unrelated programs

* email programs – plural, this is what we call in the industry global opt in and local opt out

If it’s free, you are the product. Are you giving it away for free?

I love this TED video. Although it pushes for what the email privacy could look like in the future; it highlights the free point. If you are not buying/paying for the service, you are the product. These free services may not cost you in $$, but there is a value exchange. You get a free service, the provider gets data insight into your interests, and in turn creates/sells targeted advertising based on your data. Innocent – probably. Greedy – definitely.

TED video: Andy Yen: Think your email’s private? Think again

After all email services are still businesses that need to make money to keep the lights on.

The most valuable thing about providing an email service is the analytics data that it has access too. Your email provides (Google, Yahoo, etc) with a vast amount of information about you. Not only do they have the ability to capture your profile information, but your browsing information too. Email has the added benefit of providing information about the people you contact. In other words, gmail learns a lot about non-gmail users by scanning emails sent to & from gmail users. This effectively helps target advertisements to everybody. 

Many privacy “agreements’ are yes/no — you’re either in or out — and especially online, it’s not reasonable to expect people to decline them (since use of basic services is often at stake).

If you needed someone else’s thoughts, here is Wikipedia explaining the use of ‘You As A Product’.

wikipedia
Your attention and profile is being sold to advertisers.